I own the ps3, and I'm looking into the games battlefield bad company 2 or call of duty modern warfare 2, I only have the cash for one. Which one is better. When I play a first person shooter, I usually play the single player campaign, but I also like online multiplayer too. I'd say they're equally important to me as a gamer.
Which would you choose if you only had the cash for one and why? Thanks!Battlefield bad company 2 or call of duty modern warfare 2, I've only got the cash for one?
both are definitely worth checking out, mw2 is better imo. but i would go with battlefield since its newer. everyone is starting to get bored of mw2 anyways, i did and i didn't even prestige cause the online was so repetitive, but the campaign is bomb diggity.
i'm yet to play bad company 2 but mw2 really does begin to drag after a while
i prestiged on mw2 and i really couldnt b bothered with it. it just gets so repetetive.
so until they put sumthing fresh and new into the game i'm gonna say get bad company 2.Battlefield bad company 2 or call of duty modern warfare 2, I've only got the cash for one?
MW2
Call of duty has its flaws but it remains fun always. And it has strong backing from both a strong community and an established development team.
Battlefield im afraid is going to turn into another boring game in a month.
Bad Company 2 definately. On MW2 you just run about spraying, when on BC2 it actually takes skill. Add me if you buy it, my ID is mcnicolls. We can play together.Battlefield bad company 2 or call of duty modern warfare 2, I've only got the cash for one?
hands down bfbc2 :D
i completely forgot about mw2 -.- besides looks like their shxt is hitting the fan hard with the layoffs of the owners and rightfully founders of "COD series"
Battlefield Bad Company 2.
Unless you're a 12 year old ****** then by all means go for MW2.
call of duty
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment